Uploaded by HART (1-800-HART) on October 5, 2012 at 6:25 pm
Truth of taxation part 1
Thanks! Share it with your friends!
Right, you misquoted to twist, distort and to lie. It is amazing you have no shame to twist, distort and to lie that the phrase ..”wages recieved for services are taxable as income”,,, means “wages income and are taxable as the income they are”…. I have reduced you spewing out bald face gibberish. Now slink away and lie and wait to decieve another day.
Anyway you have finally admitted to misquoting,, (for a slime ball reason).. Perkins as I posted.
Actually, Clause 5 is the legal basis for the Federal Reserve, it was created under that section by Congress “To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin…”
The 16th Amendment can’t be unconstitutional, it IS part of the Constitution. If you are corrrect then nearly all of the Amendments are unconstitutional. The 16th modified Article I, Clause 8, Section1. Besides, the Federal income tax revenue brings in over four times the amount of the interest payment on the debt. Also, the Fed is made up of ONLY U.S. banks.
correction, clause 5.
the 16th amendment to the constitution itself is in violation of article 1, section 8, clause 1. That amendment conveniently got ratified the same year the federal reserve act was signed into law. How else is the government gonna pay the intrest on money borrowed from an international bank ( i.e. the federal reserve) in clear violation of the same article and section, 4th clause i believe, of the constitution.
The end of the world is not in 2012, but JESUS CHRIST will come, that’s for sure ! Start a personal relationship with JESUS CHRIST and you will be saved
No it was NOT CORRECT….here is your post from 6 days ago where all this started “Wages are taxable income.” Perkins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 746 F.2d 1187 (6th Cir. 1984).
If your think that is a misquote, you need to contact the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.
RetSquid in reply to atywaar (Show the comment) 6 days ago
Here is the correct quote..
“..wages received for services are taxable as income…”
As already proven, no errors outside a mis-citation.
I do not dislike the case law you have posted as it supports what I claim. Let those who read this decide. I have proved your errors, you just can’t admit it, but that is your problem not mine.
Nope straight forward case law, just that you don’t like it as it proves your claims to be false.
Too bad you don’t understand or intentionally (like Harry) post case law to decieve..
I have no problem with that, I have 100 years of case law supporting my claims.
Well let those who read this decide for themselves.
That is you alright.
Only to the uneducated or the dishonest.
You can’t come up with an argument, you just talk meaningless semantics.
Yeah,, right Fool
“You’re”… “ridiculous”…not me
Maybe you need to work on your comprehension skills. Nothing I have posted is hard to understand.
Why would your wage not be taxed as the income that they are?
You are getting rediculous. Your a nonsense troll.
You don’t have a drivable car, so you can’t drive it. If you don’t have taxable, income it can’t be taxed. Wages are taxable income so you are taxed on that income.
I don’t have to drive a drivable car either. Now your getting down to Harry’s voluntary compliance.
Your reciept of the income. You are taxed on the event of your reciept of that taxable income. You can’t drive an undrivable car and your non-taxable income cannot be taxed.
Wrong….whether I drive or my car is drivable is two separte things the same with the water. What it takes, in your words “the action itself happening.” Now just what is the action necessary to convert the snapshot of time of taxable into the snapshot in time of taxed.
Nothing is entailed, except for the action itself happening. Income is taxed because it is taxable. Just like you drive your car because it is drivable and drink water when it is drinkable.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
CAPTCHA Code *